 |
| Democracy
- The National Theatre
|
Playbill
- 30/08/2003 - Robert Simonson
Frayn and
Blakemore Reunite for London Democracy
Michael Frayn's
latest play, Democracy, begins
previews at the National Theatre Aug.
30 with an official opening set for
Sept. 9. Directing is his Copenhagen
colleague Michael Blakemore.
Both Blakemore
and Frayn won Tony Awards when Copenhagen
played on Broadway in 2000. Copenhagen
was based on a real life 1941 meeting
two world famous physicists, one Danish
and one German. Frayn again draws
on European history for his new play.
Democracy is set in West Germany
in 1969, with Chancellor (the German
term for Prime Minister) Willy Brandt
taking office, little realizing that
his personal assistant is spying on
him for the East German Secret Service.
The play stars
Roger Allam and Conleth Hill.
It will be performed in the Royal
National Theatre's Cottesloe Theatre.
Copenhagen also started life
at the National.
Roger Allam
co-starred at the National as Adolf
Hitler in Speer, and also appeared
in The Cherry Orchard, Summerfolk,
Money and Troilus and Cressida.
All told, Michael
Blakemore has directed seven of Frayn's
plays. Frayn's most famous play is
arguable Noises Off, which
recently has a revival on Broadway.

|
The London
Theatre Guide
- 02/09/2003 - Alan Bird
Michael Frayn’s
new play Democracy, directed
by Michael Blakemore, tells the story
of Willy Brandt and of his personal
assistant Günter Guillaume. In
the programme notes Frayn tells us
that the play is a fictional account
of a non-fictional historical record.
Yet, despite Frayn calling his play
fiction, it seems to me that it is
more fact than fiction. He tells us
that the biographies of the protagonists
are true to the record and the political
events the play refers to did happen.
The play begins
with the appointment of Willy Brandt
after the Bundestag had elected him
Chancellor in 1969, the first centre-left
Chancellor of the German Democratic
Republic, and ends with the collapse
of the Berlin Wall. Brandt, we are
constantly reminded throughout the
play, had “Clean Hands”
in that he had no part to play during
Hitler’s Third Reich, having
spent that dreadful period in Germany’s
history as an exile in Norway from
1933. Even his name Willy Brandt (an
assumed name he used in his youth
when he was involved in resisting
the Nazi Party), was a constant reminder
that he had no part in those events.
He returned to Germany after the war
and participated in the reconstruction
of the country, and as Chancellor
he signed the “Moscow Agreement”,
in which ‘East Germany’
and ‘West Germany’ recognised
each other’s existence and borders,
and in 1974 both East and West Germany
joined the United Nations.
In the play we
see the inner workings of Willy Brandt’s
government. Brandt was idolised by
many in the German republic, his message
of reconciliation, compassion and
peace being warmly welcomed. However,
his own personal life and relations
with his closest advises was more
complex and at times troubling, especially
his relationship with his personal
assistant, Günter Guillaume,
who spied for East Germany throughout.
Guillaume’s
servile nature makes him almost invisible
within the workings of Brandt’s
administration as he slowly gains
the confidence of Brandt. He greatly
admires Brandt and also appears to
be motivated by the same desire for
reconciliation between East and West
that labours so heavily upon Brandt’s
heart.
The play is in
many ways fascinating, the relationship
between Brandt, Guillaume and the
other members of the government are
very human and believable, However,
when Guillaume is exposed as a spy
and Brandt is finally forced to resign
it seems more like an internal scandal
within his government, rather than
something that could have threatened
the peace and stability of Germany,
a peace and stability that Brandt
had so carefully constructed. The
production lacks the crisis and alarm
that surely would have followed such
a shocking revelation, and whilst
the characters are engaging, the dramatic
saga of the event is missing.
Peter J Davison’s
set design is of Brandt’s stark
and rather barren office in Bonn.
A white metal spiral staircase connects
the two floors of this split-level
stage design, with Brandt’s
office on the upper level. The walls
behind the three desks on the lower
level are full of shelves stacked
with files, which are put to use at
the end of the play!!
There are three
excellent performances. Conleth Hill
is a sycophantic Guillaume, who despite
this trait manages also to be warm
and convivial - one sympathises as
much for the spy as one does for the
Chancellor he unwittingly brings down.
Roger Allam brings an almost
messianic flavour to his portrayal
of Brandt but also captures the dejection
that Brandt often struggled with.
Whist David Ryall’s Herbert
Wehner is an impressive shrewd elder
statesman.

|
| What's on Stage
Review
- 10/09/2003 - Terri Paddock
Michael Frayn's multi-award winning
1998 three-hander Copenhagen
was set in 1941, at the outset of
the Second World War, and centred
around the real-life visit of a German
nuclear physicist to his Danish colleague
in the Nazi-occupied city of the title.
In his latest play, once again directed
by long-time associate Michael Blakemore,
Frayn returns to the fertile field
of 20th-century European history.
Back in Germany, nearly 30 years after
the events recorded in Copenhagen,
the country - and its citizens - has
been split down the middle, divided
between East and West, right and left,
past and present. The capitalist West
has managed to rebuild itself from
the rubble into a world power, while
the communist East remains veiled
behind the Iron Curtain, grey and
dull but reassuringly simple.
Democracy begins with the election
of Social Democratic Party leader
Willy Brandt as West German Chancellor
and follows his turbulent course in
office over the next four years, during
which "the great peacemaker"
implores his countrymen to have "courage
to show compassion" and to accept
reconciliation with their former enemies
in Eastern Europe. Along the way,
his personal assistant Gunter Guillaume
organises Brandt's schedule, cheers
him, comforts him - and spies on him
for the East German secret police.
As Guillaume, Irishman Conleth Hill
is virtually unrecognisable from his
last London outing in Stones in
His Pockets. Seemingly greyer,
plumper, more unassuming, Hill plays
well the oleaginous "little man"
who grows bigger, bolder and ever
more conflicted in the "sunshine"
of his idol's smile.
And Roger Allam is utterly convincing
as the subject of Guillaume's devotion
and betrayal. With the cast of his
eye and the turn of his lip, with
his delivery of Brandt's trademark
silent gestures and speeches, with
his very stillness, Allam conveys
the immense gravitas that attracts
seas of upturned faces even as it
belies moments of self-doubt and deep
despair. His is a great leader indeed.
Special mention, too, to David Ryall
who, in a strong, all-male ensemble,
impresses as Brandt's opportunist
party peer Herbert Wehner, and to
designer Peter J Davison, whose two-tier
office set, with its walls of colour-coded
files, keeps its own nifty secret
till the end.
In the programme notes, Frayn writes
that "complexity is what the
play is about". For our sake,
his script and Blakemore's direction
succeeds in simplifying the complexities
of German history and politics, with
Hill providing helpful asides to Steven
Pacey's Stasi agent. But the complexity
of "human arrangements and of
human beings themselves" that
lies at the heart of Democracy,
is left for us to judge. Is the lesson
to "trust no one" or to
follow the maxim that "we must
trust each other...there's no other
way we can live"?
Brandt may not have been able to trust
his aide, but ironically, it was Guillaume's
reports that gave the East the confidence
to trust Brandt. In the play's closing
moments, the evocative sounds of hammers
chipping away at the Berlin wall remind
us how that trust ultimately paid
off.
|
Miami Herald,
FL
- 11/09/2003 - Matt Wolf
German History
Presented on London Stage
LONDON - The
ins and outs of coalition politics
in a divided Germany some 30 or more
years ago might not sound like the
most thrilling theatrical recipe.
But trust English
dramatist Michael Frayn to put a human
face on history. Democracy,
his 14th and latest play, chronicles
four fateful years in the life and
career of German chancellor Willy
Brandt without once becoming a conventional
bioplay.
Instead, Brandt's
relationship with his most trusted
aide, Günter Guillaume, who turned
out to be a spy, works on numerous
levels, not least as a stinging, suspenseful
thriller.
The result is
a play easily surpassing Frayn's previous,
Tony-winning Copenhagen in
sheer theatricality and outright juice.
And with the assist of Frayn's longtime
director, Michael Blakemore, Democracy
gets the production it deserves during
its repertory engagement at the National
Theater's smallish Cottesloe auditorium.
The play, which
opened Tuesday and runs through Dec.
30, will be a surefire transfer to
the West End and possibly Broadway.
Copenhagen
got copious mileage from the sheer
import of its topic: an imagining
of the time spent between two physicists,
Werner Heisenberg and Niels Bohr,
who came together in the Danish capital
in 1941 to discuss the atomic bomb.
Democracy,
by contrast, has less apocalyptic
concerns but makes for a much more
animated play. In charting the ever-changing
rapport between the leftist Brandt
and his East German-born aide-de-camp
(and Stasi spy) Guillaume, Frayn places
a country split in half in the very
human context of two men who also
are torn.
No wonder Roger
Allam's Brandt quotes the famous
line from American poet Walt Whitman,
"I contain multitudes."
Brandt does, and so does Irish actor
Conleth Hill's Guillaume. The assistant
is a walking contradiction - a loyal
traitor, whose ruination of Brandt
at the same time brings down the portly,
sweaty, ever-smiling Guillaume.
Democracy
generates the constant hum of activity
- what Guillaume late in the play
calls "the complexity of counterpoint"
- accompanying life at Brandt's headquarters.
It is played out on two levels of
Peter J. Davison's set.
Britain has always
fielded capable character actors,
and Democracy gives eight of
them a chance to shine. David Ryall
lends his beady-eyed authority to
Herbert Wehner, Brandt's party leader
in the Bundestag, while Glyn Grain's
tanned, distinguished countenance
is perfect for Helmut Schmidt, Brandt's
eventual successor.
The play's heart,
however, lies with its two exemplary
leads. Having played Hitler several
years back in the National production
of Albert Speer, Allam
brings a quiet melancholy to the womanizing
if seemingly guileless Brandt. By
play's end, Allam seems imperceptibly
to have aged and gone sour, even if
part of Brandt's bequest - the play
suggests - was to make East and West
Berlin whole.
Hill, an Irish
sensation in the play Stones in
His Pockets, reinvents himself
here. Donning glasses, the round-faced
actor employs a neutral English accent
to play the grinning onlooker who
was always ready to inform on Brandt
to his controller, Kretschmann (played
by a sly Steven Pacey, who is seated
almost throughout to one side of the
stage).
The performance
shows the price paid by a life of
deception, the voice of Hill's somewhat
campy Guillaume by the end containing
its own distinct death rattle. Playing
a "little man" who helped
lay a great statesman low, this fine
actor vaults to the front ranks in
a play that is right up there with
him.

|
The Times
- Benedict Nightingale - 11/09/2003
Brandt and
the spy who loved him
WILLY BRANDT
has triumphed at the polls, and his
nerdiest PA is toasting the victory
in champagne. “May I say, chief,”
he gulps, “that working with
you has been the best thing that has
happened to me or ever will?”
One irony is that the speaker is Günter
Guillaume, a Stasi officer employed
by Markus Wolf. Another is that he
genuinely feels and means what he
says.
As in Copenhagen,
Michael Frayn is dealing with recent
European history, and the result is
another fascinating play. Perhaps
Democracy isn’t quite
as subtle or rich as the earlier piece.
Perhaps those unfamiliar with the
intricacies of German coalition politics
in the 1970s will have the odd dizzy
moment, as those of us ignorant of
nuclear physics did in Copenhagen.
But, thanks to the skills of Frayn
and the director Michael Blakemore,
I was gripped throughout by the events
unfolding in an office-cum-café
set, on which Conleth Hill’s
Guillaume can simultaneously talk
to Roger Allam’s Brandt
and report to Steven Pacey, his Stasi
controller.
This narrative
clarity is even more impressive because
of Frayn’s stated theme, which
is “the complexity of human
arrangements and human beings themselves
and the difficulties this creates
in both shaping and understanding
our actions”. What’s in
Guillaume’s heart when, after
years at Brandt’s side, he’s
arraigned for spying? All sorts of
things, perhaps, but certainly devotion
to the charismatic Chancellor he has
systematically betrayed. What he finds
particularly unbearable is the suggestion
that he might have fed his masters
news and photos of Brandt’s
womanising. “Not me, chief,”
he cries.
Hill’s
Guillaume begins as eager-to-please,
slightly smarmy, and, when matters
of state are being discussed, as anonymous
as a hatstand; but, thanks to the
“ray of sunshine” that
is Brandt’s fellowship, he’s
a more questioning and self-questioning
man by the play’s end.
And Allam’s
Brandt is still more layered, as befits
a man who spent the 1930s and 1940s
using aliases galore: indecisive,
impulsive, warm, aloof, innocent yet
shrewd, and broader of mind and deeper
of soul than the colleagues murkily
manoeuvring around him.
Brandt’s
boldest policy was Ostpolitik and
his greatest achievement a degree
of reconciliation with his Eastern
neighbours. And here, suggests Frayn,
is the biggest irony of all. Guillaume
convinced them that Brandt was trustworthy;
they used their bribes to keep him
in office; the Russians felt less
need to protect East Germany; the
Wall came down, followed by Communism
itself.
Markus Wolf unwittingly
destroyed Markus Wolf. Did the real
Guillaume approve? Frayn’s Guillaume
surely does.

|
Independant
- 11/09/2003 - Paul Taylor
Making drama
out of a political crisis
One of the last
roles that Roger Allam played
at the National Theatre was Adolf
Hitler. He reappears now as Willy
Brandt. This is tantamount to being
cast successively as Satan and the
Messiah. Brandt, who became Chancellor
of the Federal Republic in 1969, did
much to reverse the Führer's
monstrous legacy, and his Ostpolitik
was designed to promote peace in Europe
by recognising, and regularising relations
with, communist East Germany. Winning
the Nobel prize in 1971, he was brought
down by a scandal three years later
when Günter Guillaume, a close
personal aide, was unmasked as a Stasi
spy.
Democracy,
Michael Frayn's complex and richly
rewarding new play, does not keep
you in suspense about this agent's
true colours. Quite the opposite.
It's plain from the start and as he
performs his (increasingly intimate)
duties in Brandt's service, Conleth
Hill's superb Guillaume - a troubled
man posing as an unctuous nonentity
- rattles out a running commentary
to his East German controller, Kretschmann,
who sits at a table as though directly
observing. Thanks to this fluid, fertile
comic device, the presentation of
the West German government is infiltrated
by irony from the outset.
The play is wonderfully
alert to the piquant paradoxes and
ironic twists of this intensely tricky
period in Germany's conversation with
itself. Initially distrusting the
sincerity of Brandt's Ostpolitik,
the East Germans wind up more intent
on keeping the Chancellor in power
than many of his own resentful SDP
colleagues. As sketched here, post-war
West Germany is a world where power
depends on unstable, ill-natured coalitions
and a bizarre partner-swapping game
where an old ex-Communist can find
himself forced into bed politically
with an elderly former Nazi. Only
Brandt, who fled the Gestapo and worked
for the resistance in Scandinavia,
is untainted by the war - though,
to some, clean hands are themselves
suspect.
As the Chancellor,
Roger Allam gives a highly
impressive performance, capturing
the man's magnetism, his constitutional
melancholy and a strange sense that
the idolised public figure is a mask
with no one behind it. On a split-level
office set populated exclusively by
men in suits, Michael Blakemore's
excellent production controls the
rapidly shifting moods with great
sensitivity, particularly in those
uncomfortable meditative moments when
politician and spy, symbols of Germany's
ideological divide, are seen to have
haunting affinities. The pressures
of history have left both with a strong
feeling of self-alienation. Forced
to assume various identities when
on the run from the Gestapo, Brandt
now describes himself as a suitcase
with a series of false bottoms, unable
to reconnect with the boy he once
was. For Guillaume, a brief trip back
to the GDR was like "eavesdropping
on my own absence".
Even in their
downfalls, these fatherless, womanising
males are akin. Brandt fatalistically
resigns when, innocent of duplicity,
he could have survived. On arrest,
Guillaume instantly confesses his
guilt, thereby betraying his own political
masters and giving the West Germans
the watertight case against him they
would not otherwise have. But while
it irks the spy that he has been used
by the GDR, it distresses him greatly
that his case is exploited as a way
of unseating Brandt, the man he has
come to revere.
At the end, the
Wall has come down, and Guillaume
is just a face in the crowd that is
cheering the former Chancellor on
his tour. A single nation once more;
but, tragically for the ex-spy, never
again the double act that ironically
pulled together in a time of division.
Shaping a huge mass of material into
intellectually stimulating patterns,
Democracy offers a great deal more
than a crash course in recent German
politics.

|
Telegraph
- 11/09/2003 - Charles Spencer
Frayn pulls
off another unlikely triumph
Michael Frayn,
who has just turned 70, is on an amazing
roll. His brilliant farce Noises
Off is back for its umpteenth
run in the West End. His last novel,
Spies, was pipped to the Whitbread
Prize only by his wife Claire Tomalin's
biography of Pepys. And this new play,
Democracy, is the most intelligent
and gripping new English drama since,
well, since Frayn's last stage outing
with Copenhagen in 1998.
You have to work
hard at a Frayn play. Ferociously
intelligent himself, he expects his
audience to keep up with him. Here,
in his own words, he has written a
drama about complexity - "the
complexity of human arrangements and
of human beings themselves, and the
difficulties that this creates in
both shaping and understanding our
actions".
When I add that
Democracy is also a first-rate
spy story and an analysis of the West
German Chancellor Willy Brandt's successful
attempt to achieve a degree of reconciliation
with his country's former enemies
in Eastern Europe, you will realise
that this is a piece of rare ambition.
But, in Michael Blakemore's lucid,
superbly acted production at the National's
Cottesloe Theatre, Democracy
also offers great entertainment. The
prospect of watching 10 middle-aged
men in suits (there are no women in
the cast) re-enacting the German politics
of three decades ago may sound daunting,
but attention never flags.
It is, of course,
the spy-story element, so familiar
from the Cold War novels of Le Carre
and Deighton, that initially grabs
attention. Almost as soon as he became
Chancellor, Brandt was shadowed by
one Günter Guillaume, an apparently
servile, nondescript functionary,
who eventually became his personal
assistant. He served Brandt devotedly,
but he was equally devoted to his
other role of spying for the Stasi.
During the play,
we watch Guillaume worming his way
into Brandt's confidence and then
reporting everything he has discovered
to his East German control. But it
is here that Frayn's perennial fascination
with complexity comes in, the way
the human brain and heart can simultaneously
pursue two apparently contradictory
ends. Guillaume, in Frayn's portrait,
genuinely admires, even loves, Brandt;
yet he has no compunction about betraying
him. But then, if you view the wider
picture, was he actually betraying
him at all?
In reporting
to the East Germans that Brandt was
serious about his Ostpolitik, he encouraged
those on the other side of the Berlin
Wall to respond in kind. Far from
being a simple act of treachery, Guillaume's
espionage could be seen as a vital
tool in the diplomatic game. The bigger
question Frayn doesn't address, however,
is whether it was Brandt-style detente
or the much harder line subsequently
taken against the Soviet bloc by Ronald
Reagan that finally played the bigger
part in the fall of the wall and the
collapse of communism.
It's typical
of the play's richness that Frayn
could also be writing about New Labour.
The charismatic left-of-centre Brandt
might be Tony Blair's double, not
least in his determination to get
everyone on side and his love of portentous
soundbites. And, as Brandt falls,
surrounded by jealous, plotting colleagues,
are we meant to see a premonition
of our own great leader's eventual
departure?
The production,
stylishly designed by Peter J Davison,
is dominated by two superb performances.
Conleth Hill is wonderfully creepy
as Guillaume, the kind of man who
has several Biros in his top pocket,
wears a permanent obsequious smile
and has the nasty habit of putting
his face too close to the person he
is talking to. There is a delicious
hint of leery, Benny Hill campery
about him, too.
Roger Allam
memorably captures both Brandt's charisma
and the doubts and depression that
besiege him in his darker private
moments, and brings a touch of poetry
to the play with his poignant reflections
on the other lives he might have lived.
With strong support from David Ryall
as a deeply devious old politico,
Steven Pacey as Guillaume's control,
and Glyn Grain as Brandt's unlovable
heir apparent, Helmut Schmidt, Democracy
undoubtedly gets my vote.

|
Newsweek International
-
14/09/2003 - Tara Pepper
Truth in Government
A new London play examines the fall
of Willy Brandt
When British playwright Michael Frayn
first visited Berlin in 1972, German
Chancellor Willy Brandt was at the
height of his popularity, having just
won the Nobel Prize for his efforts
to reconcile West Germany with the
Soviet bloc. Two years later, Brandt’s
abrupt resignation painfully captured
Frayn’s imagination.
HIS NEW PLAY,
Democracy, which premiered
last week at London’s National
Theatre (through Dec. 30), revolves
around the powerful friendship between
Brandt and his close personal assistant
Günter Guillaume, the Soviet
spy who ultimately caused Brandt’s
downfall. “I find it endlessly
astonishing and moving that Germany
managed to recover from a situation
of such physical and moral degradation
since the war,” Frayn says.
“Everything had been corrupted
by the Nazis, and somehow out of that,
thanks to great political skill, emerged
one of the most stable countries in
Europe.”
The tension generated
by Germany’s tangled politics
gives Frayn’s fast-paced play
plenty of fizz. East Germany had been
sealed behind the Berlin wall in 1961,
severing family and cultural bonds.
West Germans bitterly opposed losing
nearly a quarter of their country’s
territory in the east. Brandt’s
ability to overcome this division
changed the face of Europe, contributing
to detente in the cold war and, eventually,
the downfall of East Germany and the
Soviet empire. Roger Allam
as Brandt gives a brilliantly nuanced
depiction of a charismatic political
leader, one moment basking in public
applause, the next plagued by anxiety
and self-doubt. When Horst Ehmke,
then coordinator of Germany’s
secret service, reassures the chancellor
that he has the faith of the people,
Frayn hits a poetic note with Brandt’s
reply: the masses like “the
man they hope their hope will make
me.”
Though Brandt
resigned when it became known that
a traitor had infiltrated the highest
echelons of his government, the play
questions whether Guillaume really
betrayed Brandt’s principles
at all, suggesting that ultimately
they worked toward the same goal.
The two had many personal similarities:
history had made both men exiles,
with no fixed roots. Brandt had changed
his name in Norway, where he fled
during World War II, assuming different
personas to escape the Gestapo. Referring
to his old identity, the chancellor
says, “That’s the strangest
thing of all about Herbert Frahm.
The fact that I was him, and he was
me. What was it like being him?...
What does he make of me?”
The fictional
Guillaume finds a brief trip back
to East Germany “like eavesdropping
on my own absence.” Frayn was
filled with similar disorientation
on his visit to Berlin. “Everything
required the imagination to fill it
in because a large part of the center
of the city was missing,” he
says. “You had to use your imagination
to see it had once been the capital
of a great country.” Plumbing
a more recent past in this rich, witty
play, Frayn eloquently captures the
elusiveness of human identity and
the power wielded over us by what
we do not know.

|
The Sunday
Times
- 14/09/2003
The spy and
the chancellor
Michael Frayn's foray into cold-war
politics crackles with life and wit,
says Victoria Segal
Twelve years
of Hitler. Four years of military
government. Twenty years of conservatism
and cold war. And now a hope at last
of ending the long stalemate in Europe.
With Germanic precision, Michael Frayn's
new play starts at 11.22am on October
21, 1969, the exact moment Willy Brandt
was elected chancellor of the Federal
Republic of Germany, the first leftist
leader in more than 40 years. Brandt's
rule seemed like Germany's very own
Camelot, a golden opportunity to come
to terms with the second world war
and, most significantly, to reconcile
with the East German state that lowered
alongside it.
His fall, when
it came, was crushing: Günter
Guillaume, his personal assistant,
was unmasked as an East German agent,
triggering a scandal that resulted
in Brandt's resignation when it was
feared Guillaume's revelations might
include blackmail-friendly information
on his impressive list of extramarital
exploits.
It is rumoured
there is more paperwork recording
German life in this period than in
the whole of the rest of the country's
history put together. Democracy
could have been as gloomy and confusing
as an old archive. Yet, just as Copenhagen
broke down events of global magnitude
into the atoms of human nature, Democracy
(National/Cottesloe) cuts through
the history to focus on personal motivation.
At times it comes across as The
West Wing meets the Eastern Bloc:
hugely entertaining, packed with verbal
parrying and effortless wit.
What at first
appears to be a dispiriting cast of
grey, middle-aged men in grey, middle-aged
suits quickly separates out into vividly
imagined portraits. Roger Allam
makes a painfully convincing Brandt,
the volatile visionary on the one
hand, the Julio Iglesias of the Bundestag
on the other. The excellent David
Ryall plays the Machiavellian Herbert
Wehner, too long in the poison-tipped
tooth to worry about the niceties
of human interaction, while Glyn Grain
plays HeImut Schrnidt as Sir Humphrey
with a freshly sharpened axe behind
his back. Frayn captures the bitchy
wit that often festers in Establishment
men and proves that, yes, coalition
politics can be fun.
Yet the real
centre of power, in the play and in
the government, is Guillaume, the
"nobody", strikingly conveyed
by Conleth Hill. Guillaume comments
on events to his handler, Amo Kretschmann
(the fittingly pallid Steven Pacey),
seated on the stage throughout as
a visual reminder of successful infiltration.
This is as far as the Spooks-style
shadows stretch; the cutaway set is
a model of modem Euro-efficiency,
only the rows of paperfilled pigeonholes
indicating hidden intrigues.
Frayn has the
luxury of transparency with his characters,
too, and his depiction of Guillaume,
a servant devoted to two masters,
is an empathic masterstroke. Hill
is surprisingly camp, Uriah-humble
yet acid-tongued, besotted with Brandt
yet irritating enough to be borrowing
a stapler in Ricky Gervais's office.
There's a touch of Austin Powers,
too: when he delivers an especially
sly aside to Kretschmann, you expect
him to drawl "Ooh, behave!"
and head up a Stasi chorus line. It
should seem off-key, but with Hill's
subtle shadings, it makes perfect
sense, the servile softness disparaged
by his employers complementing the
theatrical flair of a professional
liar.
For Democracy
is obsessed with the roles people
play, the choices they make and the
divisions those choices leave behind.
Brandt fixates on the lives he might
have led, while the unlikely similarities
between the chancellor and his increasingly
devoted assistant are gently stressed.
"How can you see into someone's
heart if you don't fall a little in
love with them?" says Guillaume
when Kretschmann queries his affection
for "the chief'. Frayn might
be criticised for giving a traitor
such warmth, but the play-wright's
interest in people, in what it is
to be human, means he, too, is a little
in love with these characters.
Democracy is
an educational play, certainly, filling
in a part of history that usually
has the allure of a post-war concrete
building, yet Frayn also tries to
fill in some of the mysteries that
lurk within us all. "So many
people with so many different views
and so many different voices,"
says Brandt. "And inside each
of us, so many more people still,
all struggling to be heard."
By laying this imaginative wiretap
into the lives of Willy Brandt and
the spy who loved him, Frayn obtains
some valuable secrets of the heart.
|
|
|